18chambers
Monday, November 26, 2012
Monday Martial Art Clips- 11/26/12: XinYi Quan, Boxing, Ninjutsu and More!
Martial Arts
Exercise Concepts
Health
Opinion
Products
Interviews
Exercise Concepts
Health
Opinion
Products
Interviews
18 Chambers
Friday, November 16, 2012
MARTIAL CHALLENGES
MARTIAL CHALLENGES
by Sharif A. Bey
The "challenge" has always been a part of Traditional Chinese Martial Arts, and serves a number of functions. There are "friendly" challenges among martial artists as a way of "getting acquainted" and developing relationships within the martial world through the exchange of skills. There are "skill" challenges, engaged in for the mutual exchange of experience for personal development. Then there is the infamous "grudge" challenge to settle disputes, and these can become quite dangerous. Of course in the modern time the latter type of challenge, due to legal consequences and the very non-martial state of present day society, rarely occur.
Nevertheless, the martial society is indeed a society with its own rules and complex societal codes of conduct. With regards to challenges a set of well known rules are to be observed, regardless of the type of challenge; among them are the following rules:
Bell was recently challenged by a practitioner of a more modern martial art called "52 Blocks." 52 Blocks/Jailhouse Rock was developed by African Americans in the prison system. A leading authority on the style, Dennis Newsome, claims its origin goes back to the 17th and 18th century institutionalized African Americans. A practitioner of 52 Blocks named Rahmel, aka "Mr 52" recently challenged Bell via a YouTube clip. Bell issued his own video response accepting the challenge, then issued the rules of engagement.
Unfortunately Rahmel, not knowing or not respecting the rules, attempted to change or alter the terms of engagement; asking that the fight take place at a venue where admission is charged, and the winner takes 60% of the earnings and the loser takes 40%.
Such an offer violates the core principles of the martial tradition. The challenger in this case is not looking to honor the tradition, or even truly test his skill against a worthy opponent, but merely to score a payday. What he does not understand is that his mere offer of re-negotiating the terms admits his forfeiture and loss of face, being that he made the challenge.
The true martial code is centered around the willingness and ability to sacrifice one's individual will for the greater good, be it family, nation, loved ones or principles. A true warrior has three core standards; he must not be afraid of hard work, he must not be afraid to sacrifice himself for the right, and he must not be subject to be bought off with money.
Perhaps Mr. 52 should examine his true intent, compare it with the martial spirit, and adjust himself accordingly. We will keep you all posted.
18 Chambers
by Sharif A. Bey
The "challenge" has always been a part of Traditional Chinese Martial Arts, and serves a number of functions. There are "friendly" challenges among martial artists as a way of "getting acquainted" and developing relationships within the martial world through the exchange of skills. There are "skill" challenges, engaged in for the mutual exchange of experience for personal development. Then there is the infamous "grudge" challenge to settle disputes, and these can become quite dangerous. Of course in the modern time the latter type of challenge, due to legal consequences and the very non-martial state of present day society, rarely occur.
Nevertheless, the martial society is indeed a society with its own rules and complex societal codes of conduct. With regards to challenges a set of well known rules are to be observed, regardless of the type of challenge; among them are the following rules:
- WHEN A CHALLENGER ISSUES A CHALLENGE, IF THE ONE BEING CHALLENGED DECLINES HE FORFEITS AND IT COUNTS AS A LOSS
- THE PERSON BEING CHALLENGED RESERVES THE RIGHT TO ESTABLISH THE RULES OF ENGAGEMENT
- THE CHALLENGER, HAVING INITIATED THE CHALLENGE, MUST ACCEPT THE TERMS OF THE CHALLENGE; IF HE DOES NOT HE FORFEITS THE CHALLENGE AND IT COUNTS AS A LOSS
- THE MATCH SHOULD BE PRIVATE, EITHER WITH THE TWO COMBATANTS MEETING ALONE, OR BOTH BRINGING A WITNESS.
- TO BE POLITE, NO ONE IS TO SPEAK OF THE OUTCOME SO AS TO SHOW RESPECT TO THE LOSER (this rule does not necessarily apply to grudge challenges, but often is adhered to regardless to avoid legal issues).
Bell was recently challenged by a practitioner of a more modern martial art called "52 Blocks." 52 Blocks/Jailhouse Rock was developed by African Americans in the prison system. A leading authority on the style, Dennis Newsome, claims its origin goes back to the 17th and 18th century institutionalized African Americans. A practitioner of 52 Blocks named Rahmel, aka "Mr 52" recently challenged Bell via a YouTube clip. Bell issued his own video response accepting the challenge, then issued the rules of engagement.
Unfortunately Rahmel, not knowing or not respecting the rules, attempted to change or alter the terms of engagement; asking that the fight take place at a venue where admission is charged, and the winner takes 60% of the earnings and the loser takes 40%.
Such an offer violates the core principles of the martial tradition. The challenger in this case is not looking to honor the tradition, or even truly test his skill against a worthy opponent, but merely to score a payday. What he does not understand is that his mere offer of re-negotiating the terms admits his forfeiture and loss of face, being that he made the challenge.
The true martial code is centered around the willingness and ability to sacrifice one's individual will for the greater good, be it family, nation, loved ones or principles. A true warrior has three core standards; he must not be afraid of hard work, he must not be afraid to sacrifice himself for the right, and he must not be subject to be bought off with money.
Perhaps Mr. 52 should examine his true intent, compare it with the martial spirit, and adjust himself accordingly. We will keep you all posted.
18 Chambers
Thursday, November 15, 2012
Challenges Issued and Accepted: UPDATE!
Looks like yet another fight may be down the tubes. The Blacktaoist hit 18 Chambers up to let us know that the fight with Mr. 52 is off, due to the inability of the two parties to come into an agreement over the terms of the bout. 'Winner takes all' isn't something Mr. 52 is agreeing to according to the Blacktaoist. Check out the video below:
18 Chambers
Tuesday, November 13, 2012
Challenges Issued And Accepted
As New York recovers from super storm Sandy, it needs to brace itself for yet another storm that's a-brewing; and at its center is a new 52 Blocks vs Baguazhang challenge. After an explosive set of exclusive interviews with the Blacktaoist, Nakmeezy, Maoshan, and Lyte Burly that all ended on high notes, I decided to leave any further situations between the gentlemen alone for the sake of trying to keep things positive; however, things took an interesting turn as of late. 52 Blocks practitioner and teacher Mr 52 issued a challenge to the Blacktaoist to which the Blacktaoist has recently accepted.
The terms of acceptance are straight-forward, here's an approximate breakdown:
- The venue- Man Up Stand Up (MUSU) competition
- Date- some time in February 2013
- Money- if Lyte Burly fights the cut will be 60-40, but if he doesn't then the bout between Mr52 and Blacktaoist is winner takes all.
- MUSU ruleset
- Duration- three 5 minute rounds.
Initially I was staying away from this story but since both gentlemen are stressing a respectful match, I decided to post it. The details are being worked out between all parties and we'll keep you posted.
Monday, November 5, 2012
Monday Martial Art Clips -11/5/12: Karate, Sanda, Wing Chun, and Much More!
Martial Arts
Exercise Concepts
Health
Opinion
Products
Interviews
Exercise Concepts
Health
Opinion
Products
Interviews
18 Chambers
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)